From a real biochemical pathway to what human trials actually found, one question at a time.
Mostly unsupportedModerate certainty
{{ hero.cta }}
Start with a question
{{ r.title }}
{{ r.sub }}
How evidence works
Tap to learn
{{ t.title }}
{{ t.sub }}
Recent
{{ r.title }}
{{ r.sub }}
{{ r.time }}
{{ lib.meta }}
Library
Connected ideas
From your seed oils reading
Do seed oils cause inflammation?
Links to five ideas you can explore
{{ r.title }}
{{ r.excerpt }}
{{ r.meta }}
{{ lib.emptyTitle }}
{{ lib.emptyText }}
Ask your library
Later
Questions across everything you’ve saved will appear here once the research API is connected.
{{ histMeta }}
History
{{ g.label }}
{{ r.title }}
{{ r.sub }}
{{ r.time }}
Nothing yet
Questions, links and files you investigate will be listed here.
{{ washEl }}
{{ sec.title }}
{{ b.topic }}
{{ b.time }}
{{ b.text }}
{{ b.text }}
{{ b.num }}
{{ b.label }}
{{ g.text }}{{ g.text }}{{ g.text }}
{{ b.design }}
{{ b.short }}
{{ b.finding }}
{{ f.label }}
{{ f.value }}
Inspect study
{{ r.name }}
{{ r.design }}
{{ r.outcome }}
{{ r.finding }}
{{ r.domain }}
{{ r.level }}
{{ r.text }}
{{ b.overall }}
Prepared demonstration. Summaries were written for this prototype from the linked sources’ published abstracts. Check the originals before relying on them.
{{ washEl }}
{{ pr.q }}
{{ pr.title }}
{{ st.label }}
Demo playback. This analysis was prepared in advance; no live search is running.
{{ washEl }}
{{ rs.kind }}
{{ rs.time }}
{{ rs.q }}
{{ rs.note }}
Research coverage
{{ st.label }}
Ideas that may help meanwhile
{{ washEl }}
{{ nt.kind }}{{ nt.time }}
{{ nt.title }}
{{ nt.quote }}
{{ nt.from }}
{{ nt.body }}
Your note
Saved automatically
Collection
{{ nt.connLabel }}
In this analysis
{{ r.label }}
{{ r.value }}
Related ideas
Your highlights
{{ h.text }}
Select any passage to highlight it or add a note. Underlined terms open here.
{{ ip.title }}
Asking the research API…
Generated on demand
{{ ip.title }}
This explanation isn’t in the prototype’s small cache of definitions. In the product, the research API writes it on request, in the context of what you’re reading, with the same actions as any other concept.
Certainty is how confident we can be in the conclusion, rated separately from what the conclusion is. Trial evidence starts high and is rated down for specific weaknesses.
{{ x.label }}
Raising confidence
{{ r.title }}
{{ r.text }}
Lowering confidence
{{ r.title }}
{{ r.text }}
This rating was assigned for the demo using GRADE-style reasoning. It isn’t from a formal GRADE assessment and isn’t a probability.
Mostly unsupported
The central prediction, that eating seed oils raises inflammation, hasn’t held up in trials. It isn’t rated unsupported because the trials were short and small, and reused frying oil is largely untested.
{{ r.label }}
{{ r.text }}
A verdict says what the evidence shows. Certainty says how firmly. A claim can be unsupported by high-certainty evidence, or look supported by very low-certainty evidence.
What was checked
Coverage shows how much research went into this answer, so a partial review never looks like an exhaustive one.
{{ r.label }}
{{ r.text }}
Sources
{{ r.n }}
{{ r.title }}
{{ r.meta }}
About this analysis
This analysis is a prepared example of what the research API returns. It was written for the prototype from the linked sources’ published abstracts, not generated by a live search.
The coverage section shows what was and wasn’t checked. Every source opens to its original.
{{ sheetWash }}
{{ st.title }}
Appearance
{{ st.lookSummary }}
Reading
{{ r.label }}
Reduce motion
Research sounds
About this prototype
Clear library and history
Mode
Tone
{{ o.name }}
Accent
{{ st.accLabel }}
Atmosphere
{{ st.ambName }}
{{ st.ambHelp }}
This prototype tests the reading and learning experience. Content that the research API would return is mocked.